Cases 21 - 30 of 401
Miller v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
James C. Miller
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
United States v. James Miller
as 23-1431
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
James Leonard Miller
James L. Miller v. Scott S. Harris et al
as 2:2023cv01223
Plaintiff:
James L. Miller
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. CFTR
as 22-51124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Clarke, Trevor Boeckmann, Harry Crane and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Amicus Curiae:
Institute for Justice and New Civil Liberties Alliance
James Miller v. E. Rogers, et al
as 22-5344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James A. Miller
Defendant / Appellee:
E. Rogers and U.S. Copyright Office
Tyree Ford v. Kevin Karnes, et al
as 22-14311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREE FORD
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN KARNES, NOELLE BRAMMIND, ROBERT NICHOLS and others
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
James A. Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ford v. Karnes et al
as 2:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Tyree Ford
Defendant:
Kevin Karnes, Noelle Brammind, Robert Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke et al v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
as 1:2022cv00909
Plaintiff:
Kevin Clarke, Trevor Boeckmann, Harry Crane and others
Defendant:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Howie, derivatively on behalf of Camber Energy Inc. v. Doris et al
as 4:2022cv02167
Plaintiff:
Robert Howie, derivatively on behalf of Camber Energy Inc.
Defendant:
James A Doris, Frank A. Barker, Jr., Fred S Zeidman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
