Cases 61 - 70 of 144
Hill v. Woodall et al
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Ronald E. Woodall, Charlene McCleave, James Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christmas v. Burke
as 5:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Chancellor Christmas
Defendant:
James Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke et al v. New Hampshire Insurance Company et al
as 1:2015cv00525
Plaintiff:
Larry James Burke and Darla Burke
Defendant:
New Hampshire Insurance Company and Flagstar Bank FSB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
Burke v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 3:2015cv03196
Plaintiff:
James Burke
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Henson v. Blankenship et al
as 5:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lee Henson
Defendant:
Mark Blankenship, James Burking and Matt Hilbrecht
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Dandar v. John E. Wetzel, et al
as 15-1683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Defendant - Appellee:
SCI FAYETTE PHYSICIAN MICHAEL HERBIK, BRIAN COLEMAN, CRESSON SCI and others
Miller v. Lee et al
as 5:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
Steven Gregory Miller
Defendant:
Unknown Lee, James Burke, Unknown Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loeb v. Burke et al
as 2:2015cv00578
Defendant:
Police Officer James Burke, Detective Cottingham, County of Suffolk and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Loeb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
James Hill v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 15-60040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES IRVIN HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, DR. RONALD WOODALL, Medical Director, SMCI, DR. C. MCCLEAVE and others
DANDAR v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
RONALD DANDAR
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SCI FAYETTE PHYSICIAL MIKE HERBIK, BRIAN COLEMAN and others
Intervenor_defendant:
PA DEPT. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
