Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Brown et al v. New York City Housing Authority
as 1:2016cv09263
Plaintiff:
Brown, Brian Brown, Nicholas Sciarrino and others
Defendant:
New York City Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CARR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv11972
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARR, II
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr, Timothy v. Wisconsin State Probation Dept.
as 3:2018cv00434
Petitioner:
Timothy James Carr
Respondent:
Wisconsin State Probation Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Schoen et al
as 8:2018cv00211
Defendant:
James Carr, Allan Clingeman, Sandy Clingeman and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Carr v. State of Washington
as 2:2017cv01326
Petitioner:
Peter James Carr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carr v. AutoNation, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01539
Plaintiff:
James Carr
Defendant:
AutoNation, Inc. , Jeffrey Davis , Wayne Huizenga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Monaco v. Scott & White Hospital et al
as 6:2017cv00176
Defendant:
Dr. James Carr, Sheriff Eddy Lange, Scott & White Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joseph Monaco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potter v. Litteral
as 5:2016cv00183
Petitioner:
James Carr Potter
Respondent:
Kathy Litteral
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carr et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv09345
Plaintiff:
Cindy Carr and James Carr
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR v. HI-TECH AUTO TRUCK SERVICE et al
as 1:2016cv05713
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARR
Defendant:
HI-TECH AUTO TRUCK SERVICE, JOHN DOE and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
