Cases 1 - 10 of 999
James-Davis v. Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc
as 3:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Jolinda James-Davis
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc doing business as Walgreens Store #10193
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davies et al v. Smith
as 2:2024cv01641
Plaintiff:
James Davies and Birgit Davies
Defendant:
Michael R Smith and 2013 Key West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Beychok, et al v. Baffert, et al
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Michael E Beychok, Justin Wunderler, Keith Mauer and others
Defendant:
Robert A. Baffert and Bob Baffert Racing Stables, Inc.
Interested Party:
W. Craig Robertson, William B. Federman, Daniel P. Markoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Taylor v. Davis et al
as 9:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Quendell Taylor
Defendant:
James Davis, Christopher Farrell, J. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davies v. Garland
as 23-1954
Petitioner:
JAMES DAVIES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
USA v. Davis
as 23-20553
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Juwan James Davis
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF JAMES E MAXWELL
as 4:2023cv00464
Petitioner:
JAMES E MAXWELL and SUZANNE MAXWELL
Respondent:
ESTATE OF DORSEY "DAVE" METTS, ESTATE OF RUTH DIAZ, JENNIFER DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 183 Limitation of Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
