Cases 1 - 10 of 14
United States v. Kyle Gipson
as 24-1583
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kyle James Gipson
GIPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17945
Plaintiff:
JAMES GIPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. James Gipson
as 22-4574
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES GIPSON
Braud v. Parker et al
as 4:2021cv00530
Defendant:
Sondra Parker, James Gipson, Gloria Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Denzel Braud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84075
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES GIPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jolivette v. Hidalgo et al
as 4:2020cv02908
Plaintiff:
Eric Jolivette, Richard Derwin Howard, Darrell Wayne Watson and others
Defendant:
Lina Hidalgo, Administrators of Harris County and its Agents Thereof and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Truman Gross v. Darren Daniels, et al
as 19-3125
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter L. Payne, Assistant Director, ADC, James Gibson, Warden, Varner Unit (originally named as James Gipson), Darren Daniels, Sergeant, Varner SuperMax (originally named as Daniels) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Truman Gross
Gipson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv23992
Plaintiff:
Retha L. Gipson and James Gipson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Abrahams et al v. Phill-Con Services, LLC
as 2:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
Ethel L. Abrahams , Frank Acoff , Ozel Benjamin and others
Defendant:
Phill-Con Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
