Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Ruble v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02301
Plaintiff:
James Leon Ruble
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruble v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv06211
Plaintiff:
James Leon Ruble
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stout et al v. Long et al
as 5:2015cv00379
Plaintiff:
Lance Stout and Barbre Stout
Defendant:
Danny Long, James Leone, Chad Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Oklahoma City v. 100 foot wide permanent easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2015cv00275
Defendant:
100 foot wide permanent easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines, Brian Clinton Walker, Michael F Murdock and others
Plaintiff:
City of Oklahoma City and Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Parker v. McAllister (TVV)
as 3:2014cv00220
Petitioner:
James Leon Parker
Respondent:
Gerald McAllister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parker v. McAllister
as 2:2014cv00211
Petitioner:
James Leon Parker
Respondent:
Gerald McAllister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: James Sapp
as 14-12102
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES LEON SAPP
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Stout v. Long et al
as 5:2014cv00427
Plaintiff:
Theresa Stout
Defendant:
Danny Long, James Leone, Chad Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis v. Automatic Food Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00308
Plaintiff:
Sundee Ann Davis
Defendant:
Automatic Food Service, Inc. , Pamela Little , James Leon McGaughy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClain v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00186
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
James Leon McClain
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
