Cases 51 - 60 of 213
Garcia v. Rockovich et al
as 3:2021cv02160
Plaintiff:
Edwin Garcia
Defendant:
Mark Rockovich, John Doe 1, Mark McAndrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boswell v. Shah et al
as 3:2021cv01340
Plaintiff:
David M. Boswell, Jr.
Defendant:
Vipin Shah, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moraga v. Jane Doe #1 et al
as 3:2021cv00440
Plaintiff:
Roy D. Moraga
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Virgina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
Paulus Irvin Perkins
Defendant:
Virgina Department of Corrections, Virgina Department of Corrections Board, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Sanne
as 6:2021cv00997
Plaintiff:
Benjimin Edward Smith
Defendant:
Jason Meyer, Marion County Sheriffs Office and Medical Staff at Jail, Sgt Cherno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Keen et al
as 4:2021cv00534
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo J. Williams
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, John Doe 3, Daniel Keen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) et al
as 3:2021cv00440
Defendant:
Ms Smith, Jane Doe #8, Penny George and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitener v. The Rutherford County Detention Center et al
as 1:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Chris Francis, Jane Doe 1, RCDC's Healthcare Provider and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Dale Whitener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe-4 v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services et al
as 1:2021cv00355
Defendant:
George Willie Yeldell, Jerry B. Adger, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RICHARDS v. GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2021cv00225
Defendant:
MOORE, FRENCH, OWENS and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
