Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Marilyn Williams et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02376
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Williams , Janice Johnson , Debbie Kashima and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Marilyn Williams et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as CAC/2:14-cv-01937
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Williams , Janice Johnson , Debbie Kashima and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. , Does and McKesson Corporation
Marilyn Williams et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01937
Plaintiff:
Janet M.. Becraft, Katherine Boyer, Karen Bruggman and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Movant:
McKesson Corporation
Johnson v. Texas Roadhouse, LLC
as 5:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Janice Johnson
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Janice Johnson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 13-41015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANICE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, Successor By Merger to Chase Home Finance, L.L.C.
Moore et al v. Henderson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2013cv01243
Plaintiff:
Carey "Sammy" Moore and Janice Johnson
Defendant:
Henderson County Sheriff's Department, Henderson County, TN, Brian Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JOHNSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01185
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JANICE JOHNSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Antoinette Johnson et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv05048
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Does and others
Plaintiff:
April Hinton, Eunice Kay Hobbs, Paul Hobbs, Jr and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
