Cases 31 - 40 of 48,448
Mario Abernathy v.Glenda Marti et al
as 5:2024cv01042
Defendant:
Wendy Y. Medina, Leon Carlo Sayo, Lisa Sayo and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jason Sandford v. Systems and Services Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04078
Plaintiff:
Jason Sandford
Defendant:
Systems & Services Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, KAMALA D. HARRIS, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
BRUCE v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
RICK BRUCE
Defendant:
JASON CARTER and CENTURION HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blowers, et al. v. Giardino, et al.
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Blowers, Sr., Nevaeh Blowers and Jason Blowers, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Giardino, New's Chanell 13, County of Fulton New York and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Corwin v. Forth et al
as 3:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Robert Corwin
Defendant:
Brad Forth, Peter Wilver, Ty Daul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Borchers v. Menchaca et al
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Jason Borchers
Defendant:
Jesse Menchaca and Gilbert Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ziegler v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05381
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Ziegler
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Willie Robinson v. Kevin Childers, et al
as 24-1856
Plaintiff:
WILLIE R. ROBINSON
Defendant:
KEVIN CHILDERS, JASON DUNN and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
Merryfield v. Fleet, et al
as 24-3070
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN J. MERRYFIELD
Defendant:
KELSEY FLEET, XAN BOWERSOX, PAM MIDDLETON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
