Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Myers et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03171
Plaintiff:
Heather Myers and Arthur Jeff Myers
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Myers et al
as 3:2023cv00842
Plaintiff:
Clint Williams
Defendant:
Jeff Myers, Drake Durham, Thomas Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petrozzi v. Washington State Governor's Office et al
as 3:2020cv05810
Defendant:
Brett Purtzer, Toni Sheldon, Susan Gomes and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Robert Petrozzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00398
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLEKSIK v. ZANOLLI et al
as 2:2020cv00673
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. WOODS, JOHN DOE, WARDEN JEFF MYERS and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OLEKSIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SULLIVAN-MYERS et al v. IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC et al
as 3:2018cv12950
Plaintiff:
CHANTEL SULLIVAN-MYERS and JEFF MYERS
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holcomb v. Burnett et al
as 3:2014cv05087
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Holcomb
Defendant:
Charles Burnett, Jennifer Minkler, Grays Harbor County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neuroptics Inc v. NYCTM et al
as 8:2013cv00770
Defendant:
Does, Jeff Myers, NYCTM and others
Plaintiff:
Neuroptics Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
