Cases 61 - 70 of 161
Shannon Copeland v. Jane Doe, et al
as 17-11083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANNON COPELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE DOE, FNU TERRALONGE, KIMBERLY ANGEL and others
Copeland v. Doe et al
as 5:2016cv00689
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
Jane Doe, FNU Terralonge, Kimberly Angel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2016cv00458
Petitioner:
Alto V Watson, III
Respondent:
State of Texas and Jerry Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv07198
Plaintiff:
Christian Davis , Calvin Beatty and Jerry Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York , Kelvin Ozuna, John and Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Johnson-Roettger v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2016cv07614
Plaintiff:
Jerri Johnson-Roettger
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whipple v. Speck et al
as 3:2016mc00036
Plaintiff:
Robert Zenas Whipple, III
Defendant:
Patricia Speck, Kathy Hargis, Jerry Johnson and others
Johnson et al v. Fujitsu Technology and Business of America, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv03698
Plaintiff:
Jerry Johnson , Jesse Perry , Yolanda Weir and others
Defendant:
Fujitsu Technology and Business of America, Inc. , Fujitsu Group Defined Contribution and 401(k) Plan Administrative Committee , Fujitsu Group Defined Contribution and 401(k) Plan Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Theoshamond Norman v. Jerry Johnson
as 16-30706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEOSHAMOND NORMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT JERRY JOHNSON, in his individual and official capacity
Jerry Johnson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00133
Petitioner:
Jerry Johnson
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
