Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. United States
as 6:2013cv00395
Plaintiff:
Jerry Williams
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams et al v. City of Lubbock et al
as 5:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jerry Williams and Crystal McKinzie
Defendant:
City of Lubbock, Lubbock Police Department and Jennifer Breazeale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gallant v. Benton County et al
as 6:2013cv00030
Defendant:
Benton County and Jerry Williams
Plaintiff:
James D Gallant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Williams v. Bradford et al
as 3:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jerry Williams
Defendant:
Phillip Bradford , Sheriffs Dept East Carroll Parish, Joseph Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Cooper v. AR Highway & Transportation, et al
as 10-3260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Paul Cooper
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas Highway & Transportation Department
Defendant:
B. J. McAlister, Jerry Williams and Glen Chavers
Freiermuth v Thermopolis WY et al
as 1:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Neva Freiermuth
Defendant:
Thermopolis WY, State of Wyoming, Brad W Basse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HABITAT FOR THE HUMANITY OF THE NC SANDHILLS, INC. v. UNSWORTH et al
as 1:2009cv00459
Plaintiff:
HABITAT FOR THE HUMANITY OF THE NC SANDHILLS, INC.
Defendant:
WILLIAM H UNSWORTH, TOWN OF PINEBLUFF NORTH CAROLINA, EARLENE MCLAMB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
