Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Cook v. Daniels et al
as 4:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Joe H Cook, III
Defendant:
C Daniels and F Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Boland et al
as 1:2014cv01598
Plaintiff:
Joe L. Cook
Defendant:
Mark S. Boland, D.O.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curlin Pennick, III v. Joe Williamson
as 13-35120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURLIN PENNICK, III
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE WILLIAMSON, Cook, Stafford Creek Correctional Center
Cook et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv03428
Plaintiff:
Janice E. Cook and Joe D. Cook
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cook v. McKee et al
as 9:2012cv00115
Plaintiff:
Joe A Cook
Defendant:
R McKee and Warden Michael Butchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division et al
as 1:2011cv00540
Plaintiff:
Joe A Cook
Defendant:
Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, John Morlarty and Aaron Tompkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. OIG-Beaumont, et al
as 1:2011cv00203
Plaintiff:
Joe A Cook
Defendant:
OIG-Beaumont, et al
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. OIG-Beaumont, et al;
as 2:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Joe A Cook
Defendant:
OIG-Beaumont, et al
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B. Spain v. EMC Mortage Corporation, et al
as 10-17559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
B. SPAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
EMC MORTAGE CORPORATION, Affecting Interstate Commerce, RALENE RUYLE, CEO of EMC Mortgage Co., BEVERLY SIBBLIES, Director of EMC and others
Cook v. Gutierrez et al
as 2:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Cook
Defendant:
Ernest H Gutierrez and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
