Cases 81 - 90 of 671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
The Excellent Raj K. Patel v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
United States, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Caraffa #350727 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hope v. Brady et al
as 7:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
Antonio DeVonne Hope, Sr
Defendant:
James Brady, Cecilia Quirindongo, Victoria Ann Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caraffa #350727 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2023cv00554
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morgan v. Biden
as 5:2023cv01109
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morgan v. Biden
as 5:2023cv01097
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Biden and David Rogers
Hines v. Hines et al
as 3:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Shameka Hines, Joe Biden, Donald J. Trump and others
McKeown v. Wray
as 23-7877
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN P. MCKEOWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, JOE BIDEN, DAVID HILL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
