Cases 1 - 10 of 123
(HC) Rogers v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
John William Rogers
Respondent:
San Joaquin Superior Court and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abijah v. Ray
as 0:2023cv05084
Petitioner:
Yehochanan Binnun Abijah and John Paul Rogers
Respondent:
Patricia Ray and Warden, Sumter-Lee Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Peller v. Anderson et al
as 1:2023cv04206
Plaintiff:
Melvin Peller
Defendant:
Anthony K. Anderson, Ann C. Berzin, Laurie Brlas and others
City of Coral Springs Police Officers' Pension Plan v. Young et al
as 1:2023cv02712
Plaintiff:
City of Coral Springs Police Officers' Pension Plan
Defendant:
John F. Young, Anthony K. Anderson, Linda Jojo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Nicosia v. Young et al
as 1:2023cv02605
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Nicosia
Defendant:
John F. Young, Anthony K. Anderson, Linda Jojo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
ROGERS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. ROGERS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 23-1016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
HONORABLE ARTHUR J TARNOW, HONORABLE BERNARD FREIDMAN, HONORABLE PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22423
Plaintiff:
JOHN W ROGERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Voznesensky v. Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02919
Plaintiff:
Anton Voznesensky
Defendant:
Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc., John D. Rogers, Deborah Borg and others
Rogers et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jill Rogers and John C. Rogers
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
