Cases 1 - 10 of 18
(HC) Rogers v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
John William Rogers
Respondent:
San Joaquin Superior Court and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abijah v. Ray
as 0:2023cv05084
Petitioner:
Yehochanan Binnun Abijah and John Paul Rogers
Respondent:
Patricia Ray and Warden, Sumter-Lee Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Hernandez v. Lord et al
as 3:2019cv00151
Defendant:
Angela Strommer, John Doe Rogers, Jane Doe Land and others
Plaintiff:
Hector Hugo Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 7:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
JOHN ADAM ROGERS
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MATTHEW BANNISTER, RANDY LIGHTSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruggiero v. Fischer et al
as 1:2015cv00962
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, H. Hetrick, Jr., Albert Prack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newell #248931 v. Clay et al
as 2:2014cv00184
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Newell #248931
Defendant:
Eric L. Clay, John M. Rogers and Peter Economus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. USA
as 6:2012cv03454
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
John Travis Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
John Rogers v. Eddie Pearson
as 12-7700
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN JOSEPH ROGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
EDDIE L. PEARSON, Warden Sussex I State Prison
Hawk v. Chapman
as 12-1100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brian Hawk
Defendant - Appellee:
Daniel J. Chapman, Correction Sgt., Paul J. Losito, Correction Officer, Franklin D. Frisbie, Correction Officer and others
Rogers v. Pearson
as 1:2011cv01281
Petitioner:
John Joseph Rogers
Respondent:
Eddie L. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
