Cases 41 - 50 of 162
Carter v. Railworks Track Systems Inc
as 3:2019cv05625
Plaintiff:
John Carter
Defendant:
Railworks Track Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4323
Al-Maqablh v. Temple et al
as 3:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Bobby Temple, John Carter, Attorney General Andy Beshear and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Al-Maqablh
Respondent:
John Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Carter et al
as 8:2019cv00288
Defendant:
John Carter, City of Lincoln, County of Lancaster County, Nebraska and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Jones and Marvel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2019cv01056
Plaintiff:
John Carter
Defendant:
Railworks Track Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4323
Wright v. Dept. of Correction et al
as 1:2019cv02438
Defendant:
Warden Kissa Smalls, Captain Shivraj, Warden Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Jamek Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01389
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JAMES PETERSON, JONATHAN WILCOX, JOHN CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01001
Plaintiff:
James Peterson, Jonathan Wilcox, John Carter and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Warner Bros. Home Entertainment Inc. v. Carroll Carter et al
as 2:2019cv00212
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros. Home Entertainment Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-10, inclusive, Carroll Carter, Caroll Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
OLD NATIONAL BANK v. CARTER et al
as 3:2018cv00221
Defendant:
JOHN CARTER, DISCOVER BANK, COLLECTION ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
OLD NATIONAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Carter v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2018cv07088
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Carter
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
