Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Cotton v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
James Cotton
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Felicia Atkins, Chase Wilhelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Doe #1-12 et al
as 1:2023cv15751
Plaintiff:
Martin Lyons
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1-12, Wexford Health Sources Inc and John Doe #1-9
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa v. Hoke et al
as 9:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
Juan Rosa
Defendant:
Officer Hoke, John Does 1-9 and Sergeant E. Velie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. DOE et al
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAVIS
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE 1-9, LINDA ROSENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin Robinson v. Lonnie Butler, et al
as 22-3510
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LONNIE BUTLER, Ohio State Patrol Officer, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, ODRC Director and others
Clark v. Hanley
as 22-302
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Clark
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Veronica-May Clark
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas Hanley, Kevin Manlef, Bouldrf and others
Morphy v. Davis et al
as 1:2020cv02788
Plaintiff:
Paul Morphy
Defendant:
Gary Lane, John Does 1-9, Willie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Bloomington Police Department et al
as 0:2020cv00568
Defendant:
Hennepin County Adult Dention Center, The City of Bloomington, Bloomington Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Waupun Corr Staff et al
as 2:2019cv00804
Defendant:
John Doe 1-9, Waupun Corr Staff, Dr Maureen White and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Rudes et al
as 3:2018cv02781
Defendant:
Scott Ruse, Jane Does 1-9, Scott Rudes and others
Plaintiff:
Juan P Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
