Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Norris v. Stonebreaker
as 0:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
John Foster Norris
Respondent:
Captain Donnie Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins v. Redman et al
as 3:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Wilkins and Daniel Ezra Wilkins
Defendant:
William Redman, Russell Olmstead, Kevin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Stonebreaker
as 4:2023cv06165
Petitioner:
John Foster Norris
Respondent:
Warden Donnie Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cullen v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Fathi Mushapha Cullen
Defendant:
Jane Jones, John Holmstrom, John Vanderlaan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thedford v. Christie
as 3:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Michael Thedford and Michael Tyrone Thedford, Jr
Defendant:
Christie, John Foster and K Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Norris v. Warden, Evans Correctional Institution
as 22-6960
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN FOSTER NORRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
SOUTH CAROLINA and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Norris v. Department of Corr.
as 0:2022cv00736
Petitioner:
John Foster Norris
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of, Department of Corr. and Warden, Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. Balis
as 3:2019cv02797
Respondent:
NFN Balis
Petitioner:
Christopher John Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Foster v. USA
as 2:2019cv00163
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Applegate v. Hollingsworth et al
as 6:2018cv02218
Defendant:
J. Nelson, Steven Borst, John Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gary Applegate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
