Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KELLER v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
JOHN KELLER
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Doe v. University of Iowa et al
as 3:2019cv00047
Defendant:
Lyn Redington, Board of Regents, State of Iowa, Constance Cervantes and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Rogers et al
as 4:2018cv11234
Plaintiff:
Emerald M. Baker
Defendant:
Chantel Rogers, Wanda Woods, Brian Popour and others
Port Marigny, LLC et al v. City of Mandeville et al
as 2:2017cv04727
Plaintiff:
Port Marigny, LLC and Pittman Assets, LLC
Defendant:
Mandeville City , David Ellis , John Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLER et al v. M and M BAIL BONDS INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01524
Plaintiff:
LAUREN KELLER and JOHN KELLER
Defendant:
M and M BAIL BONDS INC. , JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Emerald Correctional Management, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Aaron Ramos
Defendant:
Emerald Correctional Management, LLC , John Keller and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. County of Lincoln, et al.
as 2:2012cv00575
Plaintiff:
Aaron Ramos
Defendant:
County of Lincoln , Emerald Correctional Management, LLC , Lincoln County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv04979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv02498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
