Cases 1 - 10 of 4,848
Applied Predictive Technologies, Inc. v. MarketDial, Inc.
as 24-1751
Plaintiff:
APPLIED PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
MARKETDIAL, INC., JOHN M. STODDARD, aka Johnny Stoddard and MORGAN DAVIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Walker v. Turner
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Jean Walker
Defendant:
John M Turner, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Law Offices of Bruce J. Chasan, LLC, et al v. John Pierce, et al
as 24-1778
Plaintiff:
LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE J. CHASAN and BRUCE J. CHASAN
Defendant:
JOHN M. PIERCE, ESQ., JAMES D. BAINBRIDGE, ESQ., PIERCE BAINBRIDGE BECK PRICE & HECHT and others
Silva et al v. Arora et al
as 3:2024cv02350
Plaintiff:
Nathan Silva and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Defendant:
Nikesh Arora, Nir Zuk, Aparna Bawa and others
Byrne v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
John M. Byrne, Jr.
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
John M. Manley v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
as 2:2024cv01427
Plaintiff:
John M Manley
Defendant:
U.S. Customs & Border Protection and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Sibley v. Watches
as 24-855
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
CHAUNCEY J. WATCHES, KATHLEEN HOCHUL, LETITIA JAMES and others
Wasson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
John M. Wasson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HALES v. PRESTON et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
JEREMY B HALES
Defendant:
LYNETTE MICHELLE LACY ALEXIS PRESTON and JOHN M COOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
