Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Hail et al v. WMD Sites et al
as 3:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Disability Division, N. Pelosi, Brandon Breslow and others
Plaintiff:
R. Lee, L. Hail Mackle, M.J. Christian Hail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haile et al v. Collins et al
as 1:2021cv20851
Plaintiff:
John Haile, DRF, PBS and others
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Inspector General of the United States, Clifford Rhodes, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardee v. Walz et al
as 3:2020cv00729
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Harold Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
John T. Hardee, Bryan Herrion, Cedric Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hosay v. Land et al
as 1:2020cv00690
Petitioner:
John Morgan Hosay
Respondent:
Alison Land and The Attorney General of the State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benton v. Morgan et al
as 5:2019cv05125
Plaintiff:
Jesse Carl Ray Benton
Defendant:
Gregory Siemiller, John Morgan and Ryan Guffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benton v. Morgan et al
as 4:2019cv00436
Plaintiff:
Jesse Carl Ray Benton
Defendant:
Gregory Siemiller, John Morgan and Ryan Guffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randal Floyd v. Michael Johnson, et al
as 18-40640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDAL FLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL JOHNSON, JOHN MORGAN, PAM PACE and others
PEREZ-CINTRON v. MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2018cv00155
Plaintiff:
YARED A. PEREZ-CINTRON
Defendant:
MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP, MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, ADAM HARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Johnson et al
as 6:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
Randal Floyd
Defendant:
Michael Johnson, John Morgan, Pam Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Haile v. Flonnery, et al
as 16-16887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HAILE
Defendant - Appellee:
FLONNERY, State of Florida, BROWN & BROWN, U.S. LIFE INSURANCE CO. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
