Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jonas et al v. Ayotte et al
as 1:2026cv00600
Plaintiff:
Marilyn C. Jonas and Gordon-Darby Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Kelly Ayotte, Robert L. Quinn, Robert R. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413 (b) Clean Air Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03218
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Kennedy et al v. Gadsden et al
as 1:2026cv00111
Plaintiff:
Sharon Kennedy and Thomas Kennedy
Defendant:
Jonas Gadsden and Evans Delivery Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01355
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lynn v. JAMS ADR
as 26-20343
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lynn and Wilson Lynn, Jr.
Defendant:
JAMS ADR, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Incorporated, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hasselmann v. City of Ankeny, Iowa et al
as 4:2026cv00261
Plaintiff:
Charles Jonas Hasselmann
Defendant:
City of Ankeny, Iowa, Ankeny Police Department, Ankeny Towing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01713
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Hunter III v. Central Transport LLC et al
as 4:2026cv04548
Plaintiff:
Jonas Hunter III
Defendant:
Central Transport LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
