Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Reed v. Eugene School District 4J, et al.
as 24-789
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL REED, as Next of Friend to M.R.
Defendant:
EUGENE SCHOOL DISTRICT 4J, PAULA MCCOWN, JONATHAN ANDREW DEY, JR. and others
Reed v. Eugene School District 4J et al
as 6:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Reed
Defendant:
Eugene School District 4J, Paula McCown, Jonathan Andrew Dey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
KERR v. ROGERS, et al.
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
ADAM GATES KERR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, OFFICER ATIF ABDELRAHMAN GAMAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
ANDREWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34196
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ANDREWS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Powell v. Muscatine County Jail
as 4:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Andrew Powell
Defendant:
Muscatine County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOKOLNICKI v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03090
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ANDREW SOKOLNICKI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jonathan AndrewsIn re: Jonathan Andrews
as 23-1167
Petitioner:
In re: JONATHAN ANDREWS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harris v. Guardian Asset Management et al
as 3:2022cv01528
Plaintiff:
Roney Harris
Defendant:
Guardian Asset Management, Jerry Mavellia, HSBC Bank USA, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUSSO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20885
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ANDREW RUSSO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perfetto v. Hanks
as 22-1487
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN ANDREW PERFETTO
Respondent / Appellee:
HELEN HANKS, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
