Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Jose Navarro Ocampo v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71405
Petitioner:
JOSE NAVARRO OCAMPO
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Green v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00134
Defendant:
Brigitte Amsbury, Alifonso Cornejo, Jose Navarro and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson et al v. Darryl Murchison Design, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00919
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thompson , Jose Navarro , Wilder Andino and others
Defendant:
Darryl Murchison Design, LLC and Charles Darryl Murchison
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Marvin Guy v. City of Killeen, Texas, et al
as 16-51433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN L. GUY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF KILLEEN, TEXAS, Texas Civil Service Commission, CHIEF DENNIS BALDWIN, Individual and Official Capacity, JONATHAN R. RINEHART, Individual and Official Capacity and others
USA v. Juan Navarro
as 16-20250
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN JOSE NAVARRO
Navarro v. Clark et al
as 4:2015cv01725
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Navarro
Defendant:
John Clark and Denise Colins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jose Navarro
as 15-1713
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE EDELVIN NAVARRRO, a/k/a Jose Navarro-Edelbin, a/k/a Jose Edelvin Navarro Valle
Jose Navarro Alvarez v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2015cv01662
Petitioner:
Jose Navarro Alvarez
Respondent:
Drug Enforcement Agency, Michele Leonhart, Vicki L Rashid and others
NAVARRO v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2014cv05541
Plaintiff:
JOSE NAVARRO
Defendant:
MICHELE FARRELL and PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JESSEE v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2014cv00064
Defendant:
ANONYMOUS MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL, CLINTON BENNETT, JUSTIN BUCHANAN and others
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE F. JESSEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
