Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kim Hodges v. Joseph Abram, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
KIM HODGES, personal representative for the estate of Michael Donte Molson
Defendant:
JOSEPH ABRAM, BRAXTON CROWDER, Deputy, JASON KELLEY, Lieutenant and others
Kim Hodges v. Joseph Abram, et al
as 24-1292
Plaintiff:
KIM HODGES, personal representative for the estate of Michael Donte Molson
Defendant:
JOSEPH ABRAM and STEPHEN DUMOND, Detective
Hodges v. Abram et al
as 1:2021cv00500
Defendant:
Sergeant Joseph Abram, John Doe Deputies, County of Kent and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolden et al v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2021cv00325
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe(s), Michael Maritato, Joseph Beyer and others
Plaintiff:
Amae Brown, Kyle Herbeck, Benjamin Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sutcliffe v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02310
Plaintiff:
John E. Sutcliffe
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cox et al
as 2:2014cv01326
Defendant:
Joseph Abrams, M. Adams, M. Awedainani and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. United States of America
as 12-3943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Sovereign State, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Sovereign State, Great Britain, Sovereign State and others
Crawford v. United States et al
as 9:2011cv01437
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
United States, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Great Britain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Abrams
as 07-7406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE CRAWFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH ABRAMS, III, JOSEPH ABRAMS, III, CYLENIA LEE and others
Crawford v. Abrams et al
as 0:2007cv01062
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L Crawford
Defendant:
Joseph Abrams, III and Joseph Abrams, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
