Cases 1 - 10 of 311
Hillman v. Gill et al.
as 3:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Brandon John Hillman
Defendant:
Joseph N. Gill, Tayler Glass, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00358
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Taddonio v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Joseph N. Taddonio, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HAFNER v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, OFFICER JOHN DOE 1-10, DIRECTOR RONALD CHARLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grate v. State of South Carolina et al
as 2:2023cv06551
Plaintiff:
Joseph N. Grate
Defendant:
State of South Carolina and Jameka Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
BROWN et al v. VOS
as 3:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH N. BROWN and CODEY RITCHISON
Defendant:
L. VOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullis v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 3:2023cv02106
Plaintiff:
Joseph N. Mullis
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 fr Notice of Removal - Fraud
Brown v. Vancil, Jr. et al
as 4:2023cv04190
Plaintiff:
Brenda J Brown and Brenda Joy Brown
Defendant:
David L Vancil, Jr., Heidi A Benson, William E. Poncin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Maiola v. GBMC et al
as 2:2023cv08865
Plaintiff:
Joseph N. Maiola
Defendant:
GBMC and Body Politic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BROWN et al v. WARRICK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH N. BROWN and TRAVIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARRICK COUNTY JAIL, HOLDER and GABE KIPFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
