Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Jones v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2023cv01968
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, Jeff Bezos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Department of Defense
as 1:2023cv01969
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2023cv01967
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, Office of Secretary of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LOCKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09762
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ANTHONY LOCKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Wallin
as 23-40553
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joshua Anthony Wallin
Allen v. Whitley
as 5:2023cv00123
Petitioner:
Joshua Anthony Allen
Respondent:
FNU Whitley
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Huff v. Etherly et al
as 4:2023cv00626
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Huff
Defendant:
Marcus I Etherly, Tyrone D Allison, Christopher Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCEPANSKI v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ANTHONY SCEPANSKI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13310
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ANTHONY SMITH and JOSHUA A SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
