Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Johnson v. Jefferson
as 22-1815
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
A. Jefferson, Pro Se Govt. Agent, Onandaga County DSS - Economic Security Temp, Pro Se Govt., J. Ryan McMahon, II, Pro Se Govt. Agent and others
Johnson v. Jefferson
as 22-1480
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
A. Jefferson, Pro Se Govt. Agent, Onandaga County DSS - Economic Security Temp, Pro Se Govt., J. Ryan McMahon, II, Pro Se Govt. Agent and others
Johnson v. Jefferson et al
as 5:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
A. Jefferson, Onandaga County DSS - Economic Security Temp, J. Ryan McMahon II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Rife et al
as 1:2021cv00424
Plaintiff:
Adrian Bailey
Defendant:
M. Rife, C. Maruka, E. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bankston et al v. Alabama Public Service Commission
as 2:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
James H. Bankston, Jr., Ralph B. Pfeiffer, Jr., Mark Johnston and others
Defendant:
Alabama Public Service Commission, Twinkle Andress Cavanaugh, Jeremy H. Oden and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 824
Thorn v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv50101
Plaintiff:
Dawn K. Thorn
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thorn v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv50248
Plaintiff:
Dawn K. Thorn
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02853
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Thorn v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv50007
Plaintiff:
Dawn K. Thorn
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thorne et al v. P&S Transportation, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01509
Plaintiff:
Christy K Thorne and Michael Thorne
Defendant:
P&S Transportation, Inc. and Michael Jeffry Roderiques
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
