Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Menjivar et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review
as 1:2021cv02355
Plaintiff:
Lennis Landaverde Menjivar, Fernando Turcios Escobar, Ada Rodas Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Shaw v. Rewerts
as 2:2020cv10666
Petitioner:
Mr. Rahmanh Keith Shaw
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Barnes et al
as 9:2019cv00874
Defendant:
DeShawn Jones, Jammie Spann, Jevante Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAW v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00268
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY KEITH SHAW
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SHAW v. WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2017cv00253
Petitioner:
KEITH SHAW
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SHAW v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02113
Plaintiff:
KEITH SHAW
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
W.R. VERNON PRODUCE CO. v. BACKYARD PRODUCE, LLC, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00911
Plaintiff:
W.R. VERNON PRODUCE CO.
Defendant:
BACKYARD PRODUCE, LLC, KEITH SHAW and BENJAMIN STONE
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Shaw et al v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Shaw and Nina Shaw
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc and Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bean-Shaw et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv21841
Plaintiff:
LaTes Bean-Shaw and Keith Shaw
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bean-Shaw et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-21841
Plaintiff:
LaTes Bean-Shaw and Keith Shaw
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
