Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Smith v. Target Corporation
as 1:2026cv03375
Plaintiff:
Kelly Smith
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sh Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Smallen v. Davis
as 5:2026cv01909
Petitioner:
Robert Smallen
Respondent:
Kelly Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Sanders v. Davis
as 5:2026cv01910
Petitioner:
Randall Sanders
Respondent:
Kelly Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr - Fed. Question - Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Dennis v. Kelly Tours
as 1:2026cv02223
Plaintiff:
Pamela Dennis
Defendant:
Kelly Tours and Trinity Tharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hinkle-Balis v. Uber Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv07733
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lynn Hinkle-Balis
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, LLC, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Kelly v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 2:2026cv04491
Plaintiff:
Lurline Kelly
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SONDERLING v. POWER INNOVATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv01576
Plaintiff:
Acting Secretar KEITH E. SONDERLING
Defendant:
POWER INNOVATIONS, INC., The Contractors Retirement Plan for Power Innovations, Inc., Dustin Scott Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
KELLY v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2026cv05219
Petitioner:
SHAHEED KELLY
Respondent:
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
