Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Bloom et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2020cv00143
Plaintiff:
Faith E. Rivers, Richard Rogers, Jr., Frank Starks, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Occidental Chemical Corporation, Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc., Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Spencer v. Genovese, Warden
as 2:2019cv02825
Petitioner:
Kenneth Spencer
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spencer v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00298
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Spencer and Kenneth Spencer
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc. , CMH Manufacturing, Inc. , Rick Romig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Spencer vs. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 5:2016cv01108
Plaintiff:
Richard Kenneth Spencer
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Spencer et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14973
Plaintiff:
Cheryle Spencer and Kenneth Spencer
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spencer v. I.B.E.W. Local 1249 Insurance Fund
as 1:2014cv00160
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Spencer
Defendant:
I.B.E.W. Local 1249 Insurance Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Buckner v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2013cv00578
Plaintiff:
Candice Buckner
Defendant:
John Rutherford , Chalas Dehling , Kenneth Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kenneth Spencer v. Arco Chemical Co., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72402
Defendant:
Arco Chemical Co
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Spencer
ACOSTA et al v. ARCO CHEMICAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv73740
Plaintiff:
JOSE F ACOSTA, JOSE L ALANIZ, JUAN ANTONIO ALONZO and others
Defendant:
ARCO CHEMICAL COMPANY, ARCO CHEMICAL COMPANY and ARCO CHEMICAL CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
