Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY $1,362,727.64 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BUCKEYE STATE BANCSHARES, INC. ACCOUNT NO. 312026 HELD IN THE NAME OF JJF CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 2:2023cv22312
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: APPROXIMATELY $1,362,727.64 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BUCKEYE STATE BANCSHARES, INC. ACCOUNT NO. 312026 HELD IN THE NAME OF JJF CONSTRUCTION LLC and APPROXIMATELY $1,642,755.55 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN F&M BANK AND TRUST COMPANY ACCOUNT NOS. 5106230, 200025521, AND 1005278 HELD IN THE NAME OF KENT D. WARNING DBA PAYOFF ACCOUNT SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Real Property located at 12899 East Nevada Avenue, Aurora, Colorado et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00257
Defendant: $35,800.00 in United States currency, Real Property located at 16715 East Kent Drive, Aurora, Colorado, $14,691.00 in United States currency and others
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 1920 4th Ave., #406, Seattle, Washington, Together With All Its Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv01090
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real Property Located at 1920 4th Ave., #406, Seattle, Washington, Together With All Its Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements, Real Property Located at 1920 4th Ave., #1403, Seattle, Washington, Together With All Its Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements, Real Property Located at 1920 4th Ave., #2407, Seattle, Washington, Together With All Its Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. 760 W Kent Pl., Chandler, AZ 85225 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00817
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 760 W Kent Pl., Chandler, AZ 85225 and 681 E Woodsman Pl., Chandler, AZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. (15) Assorted Firearms et al
as 1:2013cv00579
Defendant: (15) Assorted Firearms
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Charles D. Padilla , Darla Sue Montano, Vernon Lee Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Graber et al v. Keyser et al
as 1:2013cv00177
Petitioner: Barry Graber , Jerry Graber and Todd Walker
Respondent: John Phillip Keyser , Jerod Lee Keyser and Kent Allen Jones
Intervenor: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
United States of America v. One Etched Ivory Tusk of Afric
as 12-4269
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Claimant - Appellant: Graham Kent Fuller
Defendant: One Etched Ivory Tusk of African Elephant, (Loxodonta africana)
United States of America v. 1336 Edna Street, SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Kent County
as 1:2012cv00932
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 1336 Edna Street, SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Kent County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $33,890.46 in U. S. Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00637
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $33,890.46 in U. S. Currency, $143,523.76 in U. S. Currency and A 2008 Mercedes Benz C300
Claimant: Donald Kent Blaine
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. 702 Kent Court, Southlake, Texas Including All Buildings, Appurtenances And Improvements Thereon et al
as 4:2011cv00522
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 702 Kent Court, Southlake, Texas Including All Buildings, Appurtenances And Improvements Thereon, 3111 Welborn Street, #1703 Dallas, Texas, Including All Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements Thereon, 258 Sunset Point, Mabank, Texas, Including All Buildings, Appurtenences and Improvements Thereon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?