Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Kevin Potter, et al v. David Newkirk, et al
as 23-2625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant:
DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPARTMENT NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR CUMBERLAND COUNTY, JON REILLY and others
POTTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03682
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN POTTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kevin Potter, et al v. David Newkirk, et al
as 19-1728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CARELLA, SHARRON BURNETT, JACKIE READ and others
Not Yet Classified:
DELMARVA ENTERPRISE
Potter et al v. United States of America
as 8:2018cv02961
Plaintiff:
Kevin Potter and Colonel Marcia Potter
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
POTTER et al v. NEWKIRK et al
as 1:2017cv08478
Plaintiff:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant:
DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Potter et al
as 2:2016cv00195
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joe Smith
Defendant:
Kevin Potter, Sandy Huthman, John Markeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POTTER v. PHOENIX et al
as 1:2015cv08457
Plaintiff:
KEVIN POTTER
Defendant:
CYDNEE PHOENIX, BILLIE J. MOORE, BRETT A DATTO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Berger v. Knox County Sheriff's Department et al (PLR2)
as 3:2014cv00190
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriff's Department , Knox County, Tennessee and Kevin Potter
Plaintiff:
Michael Craig Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potter v. Langley
as 1:2011cv01067
Defendant:
Tony Best, Helen Mae Keating Poynor, OAP (Langley) and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Potter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
