Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Handsome, Inc. v. Monroe
as 23-711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Handsome, Inc., Todd Cascella and Mona Cascella
Defendant / Appellee:
Town of Monroe, Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Monroe, Scott H. Schatzlein and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. HealthPro Management Service, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00846
Plaintiff:
Karen Martin
Defendant:
HealthPro Management Service, LLC , Wallace Management Corporation , Rehabilitex Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06246
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The Estate of Alex Martin et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2013cv01386
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Alex Martin , Karen Martin and Craig Martin
Defendant:
United States of America and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Handsome, Inc. et al v. Monroe et al
as 3:2011cv01288
Plaintiff:
Handsome, Inc. , Todd Cascella and Mona Cascella
Defendant:
Town of Monroe , Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Monroe , Scott H. Schatzlein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Agerone v. Pinal County et al
as 2:2009cv01785
Defendant:
Pinal County, Chris Vasquez, Unknown Vasquez and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Agerone and Anthony Agerone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
