Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,484
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02132
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HUTTON v. LARSEN et al
as 5:2024cv00685
Defendant: GENIE WINN, JERRY BOWEN, LYNDA LOVELAND and others
Plaintiff: Ronald Hugh Hutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10875
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HUTTON v. LARSEN et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Defendant: BILL ORR, JERRY BOWEN, MIKE MAZE and others
Plaintiff: RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vashisht-Rota v. Reyes, et al.
as 24-7171
Defendant: STATE OF UTAH, Judge MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER, both an individual and her official capacities, Judge KIRK M. MORGAN, both an individual and his official capacities and others
Plaintiff: APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, an individual; pro se allowed to efile
Kaighin et al v. Brown et al
as 3:2024cv01976
Defendant: Deer Ridge Corr, Governor Kate Brown and LT Jones
Plaintiff: Joseph Budunov, Marvelous Lucas, Randy Clase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Egobundu Koko v. Warden
as 24-13856
Petitioner: EGOBUNDU KATE KOKO
Respondent: WARDEN
K.D.R. v. Keeley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01076
Defendant: Kate Geist, Darla Sallin, Alexander L. Keeley and others
Plaintiff: K.D.R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan Dyjak v. Lana Miller, et al
as 24-3105
Defendant: LANA MILLER and KATE PATAROZZI
Plaintiff: LOGAN DYJAK
Lovoi et al v. Tome et al
as 1:2024cv05197
Defendant: Nando Cesarone, Franck Moison, Carol Tome and others
Plaintiff: Gerald Joseph Lovoi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?