Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,387
Katie Sczesny, et al v. Philip Murphy, et al
as 24-1676
Plaintiff: KATIE SCZESNY, JAIME RUMFIELD, DEBRA HAGEN and others
Defendant: PHIL MURPHY, in his official and personal capacity and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01540
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Katy-Jane Hudson v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 24-1312
Plaintiff: KATY-JANE HUDSON
Defendant: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
Holmes v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv02697
Plaintiff: Katie Holmes
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Vlasak v. Hall et al
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff: Paul Joseph Vlasak
Defendant: Marla Hall, Gratiana Handy, Todd McAlpin and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAllister v. Pulte Family Foundation et al
as 4:2024cv10883
Plaintiff: Dana McAllister
Defendant: Pulte Family Foundation, Mike Hessel, Mike Rebuck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Zamora #141929 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2024cv00761
Plaintiff: Eric C Zamora
Defendant: NaphCare, Ryan Thornell and Katie Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02001
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Harrington, et al. v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
as 24-1979
Plaintiff: ANDREW HARRINGTON, KATIE LIAMMAYTRY and JASON LENCHERT
Defendant: CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC.
Cherry #310089 v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00729
Plaintiff: LaQuint Cherry and Laquint Henry Lee Cherry
Defendant: Paul Penzone and Katie Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?