Cases 1 - 10 of 19,265
GBOHUNMI et al v. MOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE
as 2:2024cv01677
Plaintiff:
ALAKE GBOHUNMI and STEPHANIE KEENE
Defendant:
MOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keene v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01379
Plaintiff:
Dianna Keene
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Walton v. Keen
as 4:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
DeAndre D. Walton
Defendant:
Daniel Keen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Geter et al v. Keene Carriers, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01522
Plaintiff:
Roderick Geter and Carletha Geter
Defendant:
Keene Carriers, Inc., Joseph Ashley and Canal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant:
ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keen v. Onpoint Industrial Services
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Mandy Keen
Defendant:
Onpoint Industrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Keene v. Berkley Casualty Company
as 4:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Michael Keene
Defendant:
Berkley Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Keen v. Cook et al
as 6:2024cv03086
Plaintiff:
CeCil Keen
Defendant:
Darin Cook and DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. v. State of Alaska, Courts et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Keen L.A. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Courts, Alaska State Trooper Agency and Timothy Cronin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
