Cases 1 - 10 of 220
GBOHUNMI et al v. MOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE
as 2:2024cv01677
Plaintiff:
ALAKE GBOHUNMI and STEPHANIE KEENE
Defendant:
MOMENTUM ADVISORY COLLECTIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant:
ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Heikkola v. Ada County, Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Michael "Mick" Heikkola
Defendant:
Ada County, Idaho, Brian Keen, Michael Fratusco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Keeling v. Keen's Truck and Trailer Repair
as 5:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Shelley E. Keeling
Defendant:
Keen's Truck and Trailer Repair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
DAVIS v. DOAN et al
as 2:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J DAVIS
Defendant:
CALVIN DOAN, SHAWN KEEN and TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
