Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Keith Austin v. USA
as 23-2794
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEITH AUSTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mitchell v. Hill et al
as 5:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Defendant:
Sara Elizabeth Hill, Catina R Drywater, Rachel Marie Dallis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Parris, et al
as 23-5081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERY BRYANT JONES, Attorney Cherokee Nation, individual capacity, ZACHARY STARKEY, Captain Rogers County Sheriff Department, individual capacity, DETENTION OFFICER MALLOT, Rogers County Sheriff Department, individual capacity and others
Mitchell v. Parris et al
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Defendant:
John Everett Parris, Rachel Marie Dallis, Jeffery Bryant Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Austin v. Warden Gail Watts
as 22-6660
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH AUSTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN GAIL WATTS and STATES ATTORNEY BEVERLY SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00742
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. United States of America
as 6:2021cv03139
Petitioner:
Keith Austin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Austin v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv10656
Petitioner:
Keith Austin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. Austin
as 1:2020cv06133
Defendant:
Keith Austin
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BUCANO v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
MELISSA BUCANO
Defendant:
KEITH AUSTIN, JOYCE WILKES, M. CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
