Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Bailey v. Weiland et al
as 2:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Steven A Bailey
Defendant:
Michael Weiland, Keith Miller, Allan Tenhakn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Armond Lewis
Defendant:
Jackson County, David Futch, Keith Miller and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Armond Lewis
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Jackson County, David Futch and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. County of George, City of Lucedale et al
as 1:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dewanye Warren
Defendant:
County of George, City of Lucedale, Keith Miller and Unknown Davis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Prater et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00396
Defendant:
Wally Olson, Jeff Prater, Justin Chadwick and others
Plaintiff:
Quinton Keith Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Searls
as 5:2020cv00079
Petitioner:
Keith Miller
Respondent:
Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Brittain
as 5:2020cv01857
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and K. BRITTAIN
Petitioner:
Vernon Keith Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Brittain
as 3:2019cv01770
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General and K. Brittain
Petitioner:
Vernon Keith Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Jones et al
as 6:2019cv06083
Defendant:
Robert Jones, Nurse Robertson and Dr. Daniels
Plaintiff:
Harry Keith Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Merritt et al
as 1:2019cv01027
Defendant:
Cook, D Faust, Trent Fonte and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Keith Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
