Cases 1 - 10 of 14
HAMILTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv15347
Plaintiff:
KELLY HAMILTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelms v. Hamilton
as 7:2021cv00126
Defendant:
Kellie Hamilton
Plaintiff:
James Kirby Nelms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hotze, et al v. Abbott, et al
as 4:2020cv02918
Plaintiff:
Lynette Lucas, Debbie Smith Hartwell, Michelle Knight and others
Defendant:
Phil Wilson, Texas Department of State Health Services, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hotze, et al v. Abbott, et al
as 1:2020cv00345
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Phil Wilson, Texas Department of State Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Hotze, Lynette Lucas, Debbie Smith Hartwell and others
Petitioner:
Alice Aten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANTORE et al v. BAYER U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00671
Plaintiff:
SHANNON SANTORE , KELLY HAMILTON , ROSALIS ROMERO and others
Defendant:
BAYER U.S. LLC , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hamilton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16336
Plaintiff:
Kelly Hamilton and John Russell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Montgomery County Childrens Services et al
as 3:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
Thomas Adams
Defendant:
Montgomery County Childrens Services, et al, Kelli Hamilton, Betty Steely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelli Hamilton v. James Kirke
as 14-35029
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KELLI HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES KIRKES
Hamilton v. Kirkes
as 3:2013cv02205
Plaintiff:
Kelli Hamilton
Defendant:
James Kirkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
