Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Melton v. USPTO et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Melton
Defendant:
USPTO, LexisNexis and Google Chrome Extensions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. Higgs et al
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Key
Defendant:
Scott Higgs and All Around Truck, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Elizabeth De Coster et al v. Newegg, Inc.
as 2:2023mc00166
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth De Coster, Maya Gold, John Mariane and others
Defendant:
Newegg, Inc.
Halliburton et al v. Eades et al
as 5:2023cv00970
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Halliburton and Leah Mari Halliburton
Defendant:
Bryan M Eades, Conner P Newman and Connor P Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Kenneth Jefferson
as 23-3208
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Kenneth David Jefferson
Melton
as 3:2023cv04398
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Melton
Defendant:
Federal Government, Federal Contractors and Military
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15961
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVID MORGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jefferson v. Trate
as 1:2023cv00027
Petitioner:
Kenneth David Jefferson
Respondent:
Bradley Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWNING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07561
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVID BROWNING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chiles et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01238
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Jerome Chiles, Dennis Joseph Cardoza, Benjamin Franklin Carey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
