Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Social Security
as 3:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Balistreri-Amrhein v. Fish et al
as 4:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Balistreri-Amrhein
Defendant:
Judge Joe Fish, Judge Renee Toliver, U.S.Northern District Court of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Merritt v. Fincham et al
as 5:2023cv06036
Plaintiff:
Logan Wayne Merritt
Defendant:
Thomas Fincham, Abe Shaffer, Megan Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06090
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Sue Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ONM Living LLC v. Johnson
as 4:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
ONM Living LLC
Defendant:
Kimberly D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Johnson v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2022cv12397
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Towne v. Gardner et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Brenda Towne
Defendant:
William Gardner, David Scanlan, Harri Hursti and others
Pate v. Johnson
as 22-10593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Edwin Pate
Defendant / Appellee:
Kimberly Priest Johnson, Seth Kretzer and David Keith Willeford
PROBST v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER M. PROBST
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, DAVID A. RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
