Cases 21 - 30 of 3,001
WOODBERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
IRA KNIGHT and REGIONAL DIRECTOR CENTRAL OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Knight v. Kline et al
as 2:2024cv00335
Petitioner:
Harry Alexander Knight
Respondent:
Unknown Kline, United States Marshals Service and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Knight v. USA
as 2:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
Harry Alexander Knight
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, ANDREW COLE, SCHEPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
NICK D. PAYNE
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, FONSECA, COATIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggs v. Ramirez et al
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Daniel Riggs
Defendant:
Ramirez, Baker and Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Woods and Demetrius L Woods
Defendant:
Doe, Gary Musslelwhite, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael Jenkins
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Gleenover Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Meier et al
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
James Knight and Jame Knight
Defendant:
Debbie Meier, Ashley Tinkle, Snooderly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pannell v. Schildmeir et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
David Pannell
Defendant:
Ronald Schildmeir, Amanda Bridegroom and Wendy Knight
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
