Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tanner v. Ryan
as 14-1511
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN L. TANNER
Respondent - Appellee:
KELLY A. RYAN, Superintendent, MCI Shirley Medium
Tanner v. Ryan
as 1:2014cv11219
Petitioner:
Shawn L. Tanner
Respondent:
Kelly A. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tanner v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20927
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Tanner
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tanner v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:13-dp-20927
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Tanner
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Tanner v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv00435
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Lamont L. Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Abebe v. Haley et al
as 5:2013cv00635
Plaintiff:
Unula Boo Shawn Abebe
Defendant:
Nikki Haley, Priscilla L Tanner, Edward E Duryea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tanner v. Endo Pharmaceuticals et al
as 2:2012cv04620
Plaintiff:
Deborah L. Tanner
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Endo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TANNER v. ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS et al
as 2:2012cv03897
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH L. TANNER
Defendant:
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, ENDO PHARMACEUTICAL HOLDINGS, INC., AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Renee Zinni, et al v. Jackson White PC, et al
as 12-15571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCO S. D'ALONZO, a married couple and RENEE MARY ZINNI
Defendant - Appellee:
JACKSON WHITE PC, Attorneys, JAMES L. TANNER, SCOTT L. POTTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
