Cases 1 - 10 of 2,638
Williams v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02732
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint Corporation
Plaintiff:
Shalace L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Clark v. Williams
as 3:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Orlandus Clark
Defendant:
L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01680
Plaintiff:
Cathy L Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Mitchell
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Nichole L. Williams
Defendant:
Markeith L. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Butler v. Barnett
as 24-10257
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quin Butler
Defendant:
Tasha Barnett, Property Officer, John Middleton Unit, Rachel M. Anderson, Property Officer, John Middleton Unit and Bryan L. Williams, Head Warden, John Middleton Unit
Williams II v. Cavazos et al
as 3:2024cv50128
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Williams II
Defendant:
Kimberly Cavazos, Dana L. McCormick, Sue R. Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv08058
Plaintiff:
Danny L Williams and Danny L. Williams Revocable Trust Established December 5, 2012
Defendant:
Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WILLIAMS v. FENI et al
as 1:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
CASEY L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
A. FENI, AKENADI, UNKNOWN OFFICER (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
