Cases 1 - 10 of 1,021
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Williams
as 3:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Orlandus Clark
Defendant:
L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Barnett
as 24-10257
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quin Butler
Defendant:
Tasha Barnett, Property Officer, John Middleton Unit, Rachel M. Anderson, Property Officer, John Middleton Unit and Bryan L. Williams, Head Warden, John Middleton Unit
Williams II v. Cavazos et al
as 3:2024cv50128
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Williams II
Defendant:
Kimberly Cavazos, Dana L. McCormick, Sue R. Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. FENI et al
as 1:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
CASEY L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
A. FENI, AKENADI, UNKNOWN OFFICER (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
DEDRICK L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, KIM FOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross (ID 116253) v. Williams
as 5:2024cv03031
Petitioner:
Michael C. Ross
Respondent:
Thomas L. Williams and Don Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turney v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Michael Roy Turney
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Maricopa, County of, Michael Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Gillis
as 1:2024cv00501
Petitioner:
Antonio L. Williams
Respondent:
Shawn Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Loyola Medical Staff et al
as 1:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Tony L Williams
Defendant:
Loyola Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
