Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Dobson et al v. Nationwide General Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv02419
Plaintiff:
Bradley L. Dobson and Kristy Dobson
Defendant:
Nationwide General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Dobson et al
as 0:2019cv00040
Defendant:
Wendy J. Dobson and Astor L. Dobson, III
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Lane et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 4:2015cv00524
Plaintiff:
Stephen D Lane and Rachel L Lane
Defendant:
BP p.l.c. , Marathon Oil Corporation , Marathon Petroleum Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Dobson et al v. Palmer et al
as 5:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. Dobson and Marion S. Robinson
Defendant:
Jeffrey M. Ayers, Nick Rice and Luis Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chedotte et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01196
Plaintiff:
Verna L. Dobson Chedotte and Louis R. Chedotte
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Coloplast A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DOBSON v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv02763
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA L. DOBSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Banks v. Allen et al
as 5:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
"Unknown" Allen, Robert L. Dobson, Walter Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
DOBSON v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv74865
Plaintiff:
ELLEN L. DOBSON
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
