Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rodriguez v. Moore et al
as 2:2026cv02272
Plaintiff:
Braulio Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ryan Franklin Moore and New Prime, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Barreto et al
as 8:2026cv02912
Plaintiff:
Julio Barreto, Howard Sachs, Matthew Moore and others
Defendant:
Montgomery County Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 3:2026cv00212
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Goods v. Moore et al
as 1:2026cv00735
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods
Defendant:
Judge Moore, Judge Ale, Judge Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 1:2026cv00348
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 4:2026cv00056
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Haley et al v. Matyjakowski et al
as 6:2026cv06760
Plaintiff:
William C Haley, Jr and E. H.
Defendant:
Ashley Lynn Matyjakowski, Mark Matyjakowski, Adam J. Bello and others
Cause Of Action: Fraud & Related Activity in Connection with Computers
v. barreto et al
as 8:2026cv02911
Defendant:
julio barreto, howard sachs, Mathhew Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 1:2026cv00507
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Stefano Cambareri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
